Why ever would you think that? FTP is a dead protocol. The Web is very much alive. There's definitely room for innovative entries to carve out a small niche, despite Chrome's dominance.Isn't writing a browser in 2023 like writing an FTP client in 2001?
Edge initially was great, but in the past year it’s become a bloated, privacy-invading nightmare. Many of the new defaults and features send your browsing and typing input to Microsoft, and there are a gagillion sidebars and pop outs and other unnecessary features (like AI!).When I need a Chromium-based browser on the Mac, I use Edge. Works like a charm.
Will check out Arc though, for curiosity's sake.
Sounds like a solution to chromium's artificial problem, "what next when Manifest v3 is mandatory?", and I frankly doubt their solution will work when v3 gets pushed upstream.Using a feature called boosts, users can replace fonts for just about any text and change colors for any part of an individual webpage and save that state for later. They can even "zap" sections to remove them from view. You can get really heavy-duty with this by writing scripts, too, but you can still get a lot done without going that deep.
I've been using it for slightly longer and now find it difficult to go back to other browsers when using Windows. If you are using a Mac I recommend strongly that you give it a try.I've been using it for about three months. I love the simplicity and the keyboard navigability of it.
Uh, FTP wasn’t dead in 2001.Why ever would you think that? FTP is a dead protocol. The Web is very much alive. There's definitely room for innovative entries to carve out a small niche, despite Chrome's dominance.
Based on the privacy "nutrition label", by collecting and selling user data.How do they make money?
I’m more an Opera guy, myself.Firefox or bust.
As happened to Chrome and Firefox (which actually reversed course a bit on bloat and invasion). How about some reporting on Arc's prospect to avoid the same fate. How about mentioning Brave in the same regard?Edge initially was great, but .., it’s become a bloated, privacy-invading nightmare ...
Real men
openssl s_client -host arstechnica.com -port 443
then request and parse pages manually.Real menopenssl s_client -host arstechnica.com -port 443
then request and parse pages manually.
Nonsense. In the enterprise world, SFTP is still a big deal when you want to do things like sending daily transaction logs to all your clients.Why ever would you think that? FTP is a dead protocol. The Web is very much alive. There's definitely room for innovative entries to carve out a small niche, despite Chrome's dominance.
Never in my life have I thought about using a password manager browser extension thing. Knowing me I'm probably the anomaly with that.I like the idea of this but am hesitant if it’ll last the long haul. Don’t want to get invested in a new browsing experience that may not be long for this world. (Yes, a chicken-or-egg scenario)
Also, will my password manager work with it? [edit] it does!
Yes but what I'd really like to see is a modern-day version of Camino.Firefox or bust.
Perhaps a gopher client in 2001 is a more apt analogy.The writing was already on the wall even in 2001, but fair enough. The Web, despite its big-tech malaise, is not moribund like FTP was in 2001.
You're not. I don't use that type of password manager, either.Never in my life have I thought about using a password manager browser extension thing. Knowing me I'm probably the anomaly with that.